![]() ![]() With this SSL VPN, Simple NAT works and gives an SSL 128-bit AES encryption.įinally, I have a lot of experience in implementing UTM and, now, XG(S). When a branch office is implemented with a front ISP router, sometimes the NAT traversal is not possible, for IPSEC VPN connections (UDP 500). ![]() from externals attacks.Īnother trick is the SSL VPN sites to sites. It really does the job of protecting IIS, Apache, etc. All my customers with an internal webserver to be published in the net are protected with this "reverse proxy" (WAF). Tested with VM in AWS and Azure, work 5*!Īnother big difference is the Webserver Application Firewall. It can be extended to secure cloud systems with Sophos ClouOptix: It can isolate a computer from the network when detected as infected: This can resolve the problem with the "lateral movement" of an infected computer. The synchronized security interact between firewall and endpoints. The firewall is one of the full security solutions centralized in Sophos Central:Īt most of our customers, we implement a Sophos Endpoint locally on servers and workstations and firewall XGS. To respond to the question "the biggest difference", I think is the "Synchronized Security": The UTM-9 is soon end-life. Sophos security staff is now focused on SFOS 18, XG, XGS. I have personally tested the differences between the XG and XGS similar appliances. The result is spectacular.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |